Back in 2008, the British Library issued a report on the
research habits and information literacy of the Google Generation. By noting
research sources, times spent on research pages as well as the pages read of
the articles on said pages, statistics and deductions influenced the view of
how a modern college student studies their subjects.
The conclusions, though ambiguous, certainly
didn’t reflect positively on thorough research: “60 percent of e-journal users
view no more than three pages [of a given text]” and “up to 65 percent never
return” to their source. Combined with “power-browsing”, the skimming of titles
and table of contents, the cherry picking of sentences from a text containing
the ideal supportive point may leave out or even just blatantly ignore factual
evidence that could help a thesis, or possibly refute it, leaving the given
information possibly lacking or unusable.
The transition from book based
learning to Internet research that some, like Steven Johnson, writer for the
Guardian, may suggest as progress (here) can actually play into a “shallow, horizontal… behavior in
digital libraries”.
This leaves an interesting conflict:
Can young people improve “information literacy” with “the widening access to
technology”? Will “quick wins” through Internet shortcuts benefit or harm the
integrity of a piece, and can the masses understand their informational needs?
If the Internet is used for proper
research, it can be an immensely helpful tool. However, most don’t use this to
their advantage, searching databases for hotlinks and quick citations.
Source:
Bauerlein,
Mark. “‘Society is Dumbing Down’.” Brainstorm. The Chronicle of Higher Education
(13 Feb 2008): Weblog. http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/society-is-dumbing-down/5698.
No comments:
Post a Comment